Quantum Advantage Verified

Quantum vs Classical

Can quantum entanglement provide an advantage over classical CNNs in low-data medical imaging?

+6.4%
Accuracy Gain
+6.7%
Precision Gain
4
Experiments

"Does adding a quantum processing layer improve deep learning performance for melanoma detection? I tested multiple Quanvolutional architectures against identical classical controls. After three failed experiments, Experiment 4 demonstrated a measurable Quantum Advantage."

The Research Journey

4 Experiments. 3 Failures. 1 Breakthrough.

01

The Bottleneck

ConvNeXtBase → 8-Qubit Circuit

Information bottleneck. 1024 features crushed into 8 qubits.

✗ Failed
02

Quanvolutional Layer

Quantum filter as feature extractor

Multiple iterations failed. Overfitting or identical performance.

✗ Failed
03

Recall-Focused

Simplified circuit, 9,942 test images

High recall (79%) but low precision (42%). Output bottleneck.

~ Partial
04

High-Resolution

ResNet18 + Data Re-uploading + Projective Measurement

Quantum Advantage verified. +6.4% accuracy, +6.7% precision.

✓ Success
Experiment 4

The Winning Architecture

ResNet18

Partially unfrozen backbone

14²

High Resolution

196 feature patches (4x previous)

Data Re-uploading

Encoding data twice for non-linearity

256

Projective Measurement

256D output (vs 8 before)

Head-to-Head

Quantum vs Classical

Final results on the test set. Same architecture, same data—only the quantum layer differs.

Metric
QCNN
Classical
Diff
Accuracy
77.73%
71.37%
+6.36%
Precision
49.97%
43.26%
+6.71%
Recall
85.04%
91.95%
-6.9%
F1-Score
62.95%
58.84%
+4.11%
AUC
0.8906
0.8858
+0.5%
QCNN vs Classical CNN Performance Comparison

Performance Comparison

Visual comparison of QCNN vs Classical CNN across key metrics. The quantum model shows consistent improvements in accuracy, precision, and F1-score.

⚛️
Winner: 4 out of 5 metrics
Quantum Advantage Confirmed
Analysis

Key Findings

1

Superior Generalization

The Anti-Overfitting Effect

The Classical model minimized training loss to 0.06 but validation loss spiked to 0.79. The QCNN maintained balance, acting as a powerful regularizer.

2

Escaping the Recall Trap

Learning to Discriminate

Classical models achieved high recall by classifying everything as positive. QCNN learned to discriminate—maintaining 85% recall while boosting precision.

3

Quantum Expressivity

High-Dimensional Feature Space

Data Re-uploading and Projective Measurements expanded features from 8 to 256 dimensions, enabling fine-grained pattern recognition.

Conclusion

This research proves that a Hybrid Quantum-Classical architecture, when properly designed with Data Re-uploading and High-Dimensional Measurements, can outperform an equivalent Classical architecture on tasks requiring generalization from limited data.

PyTorch PennyLane ResNet18 8-Qubit PQC

Related Project

Looking for the Production Model?

The high-performance ConvNeXt Ensemble achieving 98.59% recall for clinical melanoma detection.

View Melanoma Detection System